Key Takeaways
Guardz features cover many of the security functions managed service providers (MSPs) need to protect small and midsize customers, including identity, endpoint, email, security awareness, external exposure, and managed detection and response (MDR).
The bigger question for buyers is whether those capabilities provide the visibility, response coverage, and operational efficiency their service model requires.
Guardz has expanded considerably since launching in 2022, adding third-party technologies such as SentinelOne endpoint detection and response (EDR) and Check Point email security alongside its own security controls. That gives MSPs a way to consolidate several functions into one operational experience, but features and security depth vary by plan.
This guide covers Guardz features, pricing tiers, integrations, benefits, limitations, and the criteria MSPs should use when evaluating the platform.
Guardz is an MSP-focused cybersecurity platform that brings multiple security controls into one environment for protecting and managing client organizations. Its capabilities span identity, endpoints, email, security awareness, external exposure, cloud data, and managed detection and response, with additional protections available through higher-tier plans.
Guardz is designed around the MSP operating model, combining client security management with partner-oriented administration and reporting. That makes it particularly relevant to service providers looking to manage multiple customer environments through fewer interfaces.
Guardz divides its capabilities across three primary paid plans: Pro, Ultimate, and Elite. The distinction matters because several of the capabilities an MSP might associate with a complete detection and response service do not appear in every tier.
| Capability | What Guardz Provides | Plan Availability / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Identity threat detection and response | Surfaces identity-related risks and compromised accounts, enabling MSPs to evaluate identity activity alongside other security issues, particularly in Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace environments. | Available across paid plans. MSPs with more advanced identity requirements should compare detection coverage, investigation context, and available response actions. |
| Endpoint protection and EDR | Provides core endpoint protection, with higher tiers adding SentinelOne-powered EDR, deeper telemetry, threat hunting, and forensic visibility. | Pro supports core endpoint protections and bring-your-own SentinelOne licensing. Ultimate includes SentinelOne Control EDR. Elite includes SentinelOne Complete with deeper investigation capabilities. |
| Email security | Uses Check Point-powered email protection to help detect phishing, malicious messages, and other email-based threats. Higher tiers add more advanced controls. | Pro includes core email protection. Ultimate expands email security capabilities. Elite adds outbound data loss prevention (DLP) and email encryption. |
| Security awareness and phishing simulation | Includes adaptive security awareness training and phishing simulations so MSPs can address user risk alongside technical controls. | Available across paid plans and can reduce the need for a separate awareness platform for smaller clients. |
| External exposure and dark web monitoring | Scans for externally exposed assets and compromised credentials that may create risk outside the managed endpoint environment. | Available across paid plans and can support customer security reviews with additional exposure context. |
| Managed detection and response | Provides 24/7 monitoring, investigation, triage, and incident response across supported environments. | MDR is included in Ultimate and Elite, not the core Pro plan. Buyers should compare plans based on the level of managed response they actually need. |
| Threat hunting and advanced investigation | Adds deeper endpoint telemetry, proactive threat hunting, and forensic investigation for more complex security operations. | Primarily associated with Elite through SentinelOne Complete and its advanced investigation capabilities. |
| Data loss prevention and encryption | Adds controls designed to help protect sensitive outbound email content and support stronger compliance requirements. | Available in Elite. |
| MSP management capabilities | Supports multi-client administration, reporting, white labeling, and other partner-oriented workflows designed around service-provider operations. | Core to Guardz’s MSP positioning rather than a separate security layer. |
| Integrations | Connects with common MSP and security platforms including Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SentinelOne, Check Point, and PSA/RMM systems. | Supports common MSP and security ecosystems; integration requirements vary by client stack. |
Guardz offers Pro, Ultimate, and Elite plans with per-user pricing, but standard paid-plan pricing is not publicly listed.
Guardz also offers trial and community options for eligible MSPs. MSPs should compare the tier that contains the capabilities they actually need, not just the entry price.
Guardz integrates with platforms including Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SentinelOne, Check Point, ConnectWise, HaloPSA, and SuperOps. The more complex an MSP’s environment becomes, the more important it is to look beyond whether an integration exists and understand what data, workflows, and response actions it actually supports.
MSPs should ask:
For the right MSP, Guardz has several clear advantages.
The same consolidation strategy can create trade-offs for organizations that need greater depth or a wider operational footprint.
Advanced EDR, MDR, forensic investigation, DLP, and encryption are not available uniformly across Guardz plans. MSPs should identify the tier that matches their required service level before comparing Guardz with another platform on price or capabilities.
SentinelOne provides Guardz’s higher-tier EDR capabilities, while Check Point supplies important email security functionality. MSPs should understand how telemetry, investigation, and remediation move between these technologies and whether those workflows remain consistent across the platform.
Some reviewers cite limitations around customization, network telemetry, APIs, and third-party integrations. These gaps may matter more for MSPs that need to pull a wider range of data into investigations or automate response across complex client environments.
Guardz can fit naturally into Microsoft 365- and Google Workspace-heavy environments. MSPs supporting a wider mix of network, cloud, identity, and security infrastructure should verify coverage against the systems their clients actually use.
MSPs that find Guardz too limited for their client mix may also want to compare other Guardz alternatives based on security coverage, integration depth, response automation, and MDR requirements.
Guardz and Cynet both help lean security teams and MSPs consolidate cybersecurity operations, but they take different approaches. Guardz brings several security capabilities and partner technologies into an MSP-focused platform, while Cynet natively unifies detection, investigation, response, and 24×7 MDR across a broader attack surface.
For a deeper breakdown of architecture, coverage, MDR, automation, and MSP fit, see the full Cynet vs. Guardz comparison.
The right platform depends less on the number of features it lists and more on how well it supports your client environments, response model, and operational capacity. When comparing Guardz, Cynet, or other MSP-focused cybersecurity platforms, evaluate how each option performs against the way your team actually works.
MSPs considering adjacent options can also review the key differences between Huntress vs. Guardz as part of that evaluation.
Guardz gives MSPs a way to consolidate several common cybersecurity functions for SMB-focused environments. The right choice depends on how much visibility, automation, integration depth, and managed response your team needs as client requirements grow.
Cynet is built for lean security teams and MSPs that want to reduce manual security work while maintaining visibility and response across the environment.
Request a demo to see how Cynet approaches detection, investigation, and response across the full attack path.
Guardz includes endpoint detection and response capabilities through SentinelOne in its higher-tier plans, but buyers should evaluate the broader platform based on how identity, endpoint, email, exposure, and managed response capabilities work together. If extended detection and response is a priority, compare telemetry breadth, correlation, and remediation across the full environment.
A consolidated security stack brings multiple products into a more centralized management experience. A unified cybersecurity platform connects telemetry, detection, investigation, and response across security layers, making it easier to understand and respond to activity spanning multiple parts of the environment.
Native capabilities can provide more consistent telemetry, investigation, and response workflows because they operate within the same platform architecture. Integrated technologies can still provide strong protection, but MSPs should understand how data moves between systems and where investigation and remediation actually occur.
MDR can extend coverage beyond an MSP’s internal operating hours and provide additional investigation and response expertise. When comparing services, look beyond whether MDR is offered and confirm which plans include it, what the team monitors, how incidents are investigated, and whether analysts can take containment or remediation actions.
See how modern teams cut complexity and stop threats
Search results for:
