Zero trust is a security model that addresses internal network vulnerabilities by eliminating implicit trust. The basic premise of zero trust is that trusting devices and individuals can open the door to exploits and cyberattacks. Organizations should distrust all access requests by default, even from authenticated users, allowing only explicitly authorized actions for the specific user or entity.
Traditional security approaches like firewalls and VPNs focus on securing the network from external threats. Zero trust principles help protect against insider threats (i.e., compromised users or devices). They require the system to authenticate all devices and identities across the entire network rather than relying on the perimeter.
Restricting who can access each part of the network can significantly reduce the likelihood of hackers accessing secured content. Internal network security is especially important for organizations with many employees accessing corporate assets remotely. Zero trust provides stronger protection against advanced attacks that target cloud environments and remote devices, where traditional perimeter-based security is ineffective.
The zero trust security model incorporates network security principles like microsegmentation, which allows IT teams to isolate resources to contain potential threats and prevent them from spreading across the enterprise. It helps mitigate identity theft and user account compromise, enabling organizations to enforce fine-grained role-based access policies and protect sensitive data.
While the specific zero trust strategy depends on the organization and its unique challenges, the zero trust model should always incorporate the following principles.
The protected IT surface encompasses all the devices, services, users, and data connected to an organization’s network. It includes the network backbone, which provides the means for transferring sensitive data.
A major advantage of zero trust is that it addresses the growing problem of securing a modern protected surface, which usually spans beyond the firewalled network or LAN. Conventional edge and perimeter-based tools don’t offer the same security coverage as a zero trust network architecture, making them inadequate for protecting devices outside the corporate network.
Changing data flow patterns has prompted security vendors to offer security tools outside the network edge to protect devices, applications, and data. Automated service and asset inventory tools should supplement the manual inventory process—a hybrid approach helps security teams prioritize the assets requiring protection.
Once an organization has mapped the protected surface, the next step is identifying and evaluating the network security controls already in place. The IT department likely has many useful tools for implementing zero trust, but they might not be in the right location or have up-to-date configurations.
This evaluation complements the protected surface mapping because it allows the IT security team to determine the best place to redeploy or repurpose existing tools while identifying gaps they cannot cover. In most cases, the team will adjust the settings to extend to the Internet and cloud-based resources.
The existing security stack is usually insufficient to implement a comprehensive zero trust architecture. Most organizations add new tools to provide an additional protection layer and fill the security gaps. Security vendors offer specially designed to help implement a zero trust model.
For example, many enterprises use access controls, network microsegmentation, single sign-on (SSO), and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to implement a zero trust framework. They can also leverage advanced threat protection solutions to detect emerging threats and apply security policies to vulnerable resources throughout the protected surface.
The zero trust system must check all data and service requests against specified access policies. Zero trust relies on granular access policies defined by the organization. These policies also help manage the risk of sharing data and services with third parties such as partners or guest users.
The zero trust architecture must have a powerful security policy engine, providing a secure, flexible access control mechanism that can adapt to changing resources and request patterns.
The final zero trust principle involves monitoring activity across the protected surface and leveraging the right alerting tools. These tools enable security teams to properly understand how effective the security policies are and whether attackers have exploited gaps in the zero trust framework.
Even with a zero trust architecture, security can never be complete and requires ongoing efforts to track activity and identify malicious behavior. The sooner the teams catch the threat, the faster they can remove it and minimize the damage. Businesses should also conduct root cause analysis to find and fix deficiencies in their existing security strategy.
Distributed security approaches like zero trust can be difficult for security administrators to monitor properly. However, modern network security monitoring tools combine automation with artificial intelligence to ease the burden.
Monitoring tools like network detection and response (NDR) and security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) help identify the root cause of security threats and offer remediation steps, reducing the human effort required to address security incidents.
Learn more in our guides to:
The first challenge when implementing a zero trust security strategy is to gain the support of stakeholders—the people who can benefit most from a zero trust architecture. Administrators should work with various teams to plan the steps involved in the zero trust implementation process.
This process should include the following steps:
Organizations often begin this process gradually, observing the impact of the transition to zero trust. For instance, they might start by introducing MFA to establish trust when entities request access to the corporate network. Next, they might apply security controls to endpoint devices to avoid exploits. Microsegmentation adds another protection layer, while cybersecurity policies control access throughout the organization.
Organizations should operate in a report-only mode in the early stages to evaluate the zero trust strategy. This mode allows most access requests while evaluating the impact of security decisions. When security teams are more confident, they can implement the changes fully.
Cynet 360 AutoXDR helps organizations align with the zero trust principles discussed above. Cynet 360 customers improve their understanding of their architecture and how effective the security policies are, as well as whether attackers have exploited gaps in the zero trust framework.
Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ is the world’s first Autonomous Breach Protection platform that natively integrates the endpoint, network and user attack prevention & detection of XDR with the automated investigation and remediation capabilities of SOAR, backed by a 24/7 world-class MDR service. End to end, fully automated breach protection is now within reach of any organization, regardless of security team size and skill level.
Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ can be deployed across thousands of endpoints in less than two hours. It can be immediately used to uncover advanced threats and then perform automatic or manual remediation, disrupt malicious activity and minimize damage caused by attacks.
Let’s get started
Ready to extend visibility, threat detection and response?