Incident response (IR) is the process by which an organization handles a data breach or cyberattack. It is an effort to quickly identify an attack, minimize its effects, contain damage, and remediate the cause to reduce the risk of future incidents.
NIST, SANS, and other leading security institutes offer several approaches to building a structured incident response process. In this article, we dive into all aspects of incident response: building a plan, technologies, services, platforms, AI, automation, and more.
An incident response plan is a set of documented procedures detailing the steps that should be taken in each phase of incident response. It should include guidelines for roles and responsibilities, communication plans, and standardized response protocols.
Within your plan it is important to use clear language and define any ambiguous terms. One set of terms that are frequently confused is event, alert, and incident. When using these terms in your plan, it can help to restrict use as follows:
Organizations without an incident response plan often find themselves unprepared when incidents occur, leading to poorly coordinated response efforts, extended resolution times, and serious reputational damage. Recent high-profile data breaches demonstrate numerous examples of this:
An effective incident response plan goes beyond just a technical exercise. It must reflect the larger business objectives, operational needs, and risk appetite of the organization. By integrating strategic and operational perspectives into incident management, leaders can respond more decisively to incidents, reducing operational disruption and limiting data losses.
Furthermore, when faced with external scrutiny—from regulators, media, customers, or investors—organizations can demonstrate accountability and robust due diligence by showcasing a documented and well-executed incident response plan, affirming that they have responsibly managed and learned from incidents.
There are many types of cybersecurity incidents that could result in intrusions on an organization’s network:
Learn more in our detailed guide to security stacks.
In the introduction to this article we discussed two main options for an IR process, the NIST incident response process with four steps and the SANS incident response process with six phases.
According to SANS, there are six phases to incident response. These six steps occur in a cycle each time an incident occurs. The steps are:
Learn more in our detailed guide to incident response policy.
The first step is to review existing security measures and policies to determine effectiveness. This involves performing a risk assessment to determine what vulnerabilities currently exist and the priority of your assets. This information is then applied to prioritize responses and reconfigure systems so that high-priority assets are protected.
This phase is also where you write new policies and procedures and refine existing ones. These procedures include a communication plan and assignment of roles and responsibilities during an incident.
When an incident is detected, team members need to work to identify the nature of the attack, its source, and the goals of the attacker.
During identification, any evidence collected needs to be protected and retained for later in-depth analysis. Responders should document all steps taken and evidence found in detail. This can help you more effectively prosecute if an attacker is identified.
Communication plans are also typically initiated at this phase, informing security members, stakeholders, authorities, legal counsel, and eventually users of the incident and what steps need to be taken.
Learn more in our detailed guide to incident response analyst.
After an incident is identified, containment methods are determined and enacted. The goal is to advance to this stage as quickly as possible to minimize the amount of damage caused.
Containment is often accomplished in sub-phases:
During and after containment, the full extent of an attack is made visible. Once teams are aware of all affected systems and resources, they can begin ejecting attackers and eliminating malware from systems. This phase continues until all traces of the attack are removed. In some cases, this may require taking systems off-line so assets can be replaced with clean versions in recovery.
In this phase, teams bring updated replacement systems online. Ideally, systems can be restored without loss of data but this isn’t always possible.
In the latter case, teams must determine when the last clean copy of data was created and restore from it. The recovery phase typically extends for a while as it also includes monitoring systems for a while after an incident to ensure that attackers don’t return.
The lessons learned phase is one in which your team reviews what steps were taken during a response. Members should address what went well, what didn’t, and make suggestions for future improvements. Any incomplete documentation should also be wrapped up in this phase.
Learn more in our detailed guide to incident response certification.
Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools continuously monitor endpoints such as servers, desktops, laptops, and mobile devices for suspicious behaviors. EDR collects detailed endpoint telemetry, analyzing it to uncover attack indicators and support rapid mitigation actions.
Extended detection and response (XDR) broadens the scope by aggregating data across multiple security layers, including endpoints, network devices, cloud workloads, and email systems. By correlating information from varied sources, XDR provides a comprehensive view of incidents, allowing responders to pinpoint threats, understand attack chains, and swiftly apply containment strategies.
Security information and event management (SIEM) platforms gather and analyze data from network hardware, infrastructure, applications, endpoints, and cloud environments, aggregating logs into centralized storage. SIEM tools correlate events from diverse data sources to identify patterns, anomalies, or threats.
During incident response, SIEM alerts analysts about suspicious activities, providing necessary context to facilitate incident investigation and remediation steps. SIEM platforms also serve as an audit trail, retaining log data essential for forensic investigations, regulatory compliance, and post-incident analysis.
Security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) platforms automate routine and repetitive tasks involved in incident handling. SOAR enables analysts to define workflows—known as playbooks—that automatically execute actions such as isolating compromised hosts, blocking malicious IP addresses, initiating malware scans, and revoking suspicious user credentials.
Automation speeds up incident response, ensures consistent execution of remediation steps, and frees security personnel to prioritize complex incident analysis. Additionally, SOAR tools document incident-handling procedures, improving transparency and helping teams review and refine future incident responses.
User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) technologies analyze normal user and entity patterns to detect anomalous activities indicative of security threats. Using techniques such as machine learning and statistical analysis, UEBA systems uncover insider threats, account compromise, lateral movement, database misuse, and other anomalies typically missed by traditional rule-based tools.
During incident response, UEBA identifies suspicious behaviors early, allowing analysts to intervene before significant damage occurs. Furthermore, behavioral analytics helps incident responders understand attacker actions, measure the scope of a breach, and discover previously undetected compromise vectors.
Attack surface management (ASM) tools continuously evaluate an organization’s externally exposed IT assets, identifying vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, neglected resources, or unauthorized shadow IT. By proactively identifying security weaknesses, ASM tools enable defenders to remediate these exposures before attackers exploit them.
During incident response, ASM tools help teams quickly map external-facing assets, comprehensively assess the exposure landscape, and pinpoint attacker entry points. Continuously updated visibility and accurate asset tracking facilitate faster containment, eradication, and recovery efforts, ensuring secure restoration of affected systems and reducing susceptibility to follow-on attacks.
An incident response plan template is a blueprint organizations can use to build and execute their incident response plan. The template is a document that includes a framework, guidelines, steps and procedures to follow in case of a security incident. It can also include pre-built checklists, communication plans, and roles/responsibilities. With the incident response template, organizations have a clear plan guiding them through detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident review, in case of a data breach or cyber attack.
Free incident response templates are widely available online, often provided by cybersecurity vendors, government agencies like CISA or NIST, and professional communities. Using them can save time and provide structure during high-stress events. They also help ensure that critical steps aren’t missed, like evidence preservation or regulatory notification. For teams just getting started with incident response, templates can be a great teaching tool and a foundation to build a more customized incident response plan over time.
Whichever template you choose, it’s recommended to adapt it to your specific infrastructure, team size, or legal obligations. In addition, it’s recommended to rehearse the template in tabletop exercises and update them regularly based on lessons learned and changing threat landscapes. Otherwise, over-reliance on a generic template might give a false sense of preparedness.
Learn more in our in-depth guide about incident response templates.
In my experience, here are tips that can help you better adapt to the topic of incident response (IR):
Incident response frameworks are developed to help organizations create standardized response plans. These frameworks are typically developed by large organizations with a significant amount of security expertise and experience. Two of the best known of these frameworks are those developed by NIST and SANS.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a U.S. government agency dedicated to advancements in technology. As part of their cybersecurity efforts, they developed the NIST incident response framework. This framework is comprehensive, including details of how to create an IRP, an incident response team, a communication plan, and training scenarios.
This framework has four official steps which condense the 6 phases of incident response into the following:
The reason for this condensation is that NIST believes that containment, eradication, and recovery are all overlapping phases. For example, as you contain threats within your systems, you should not wait to eradicate issues until all threats are found. Rather, you should contain and eliminate threats as soon as possible, even if other threats remain.
Likewise, recovery is not a strict step, rather a process that depends on the priority and content of the assets being recovered. For example, you may choose to hold off on recovering high priority assets until an attack is fully eliminated to keep your data more secure.
SysAdmin, Audit, Network, and Security (SANS) is a private organization that works to cooperatively research and educate the public on security issues. One of their major contributions to cybersecurity is the SANS incident response framework.
The SANS framework includes the six phases individually, calling the phases:
Inside the SANS framework, are basic descriptions of the phases. SANS also includes an IR checklist for each phase and two templates with useful system commands for the preparation and identification phases. These templates are available for Windows and UNIX systems.
An incident response team is a team responsible for enacting your IRP. This team is sometimes also referred to as a computer security incident response team (CSIRT), cyber incident response team (CIRT), or a computer emergency response team (CERT).
The key duties of your CSIRT are to prevent, manage, and respond to security incidents. This can involve researching threats, developing policies and procedures, and training end users in cybersecurity best practices.
Learn more in our detailed guide to incident response management.
How well you build your CSIRT plays a major role in how effective your incident response efforts are. If you are unable to fill all of the necessary roles and responsibilities, your response will have gaps that can lead to more damage and longer attacks. To avoid this, you should consider developing your team with the help of the NIST guidelines.
According to the NIST framework, there are three different models of CSIRT you can apply:
Knowing which model is best for your organization can be a challenge. To help you decide, you can again refer to the NIST guidelines which provide some considerations to help:
Learn more in our detailed guide to csirt.
Incident Response Technologies are tools and platforms that help organizations detect, investigate, respond to, and recover from cybersecurity incidents. These technologies aim to automate and streamline the process of identifying threats, containing them quickly, and minimizing damage to systems, data, and operations.
Common types of incident response technologies include:
Incident response (IR) services are managed services that can replace or supplement in-house teams. These services usually work on retainer with a monthly cost and a set range of services. The benefit of these services is that they typically offer a higher level of expertise than is available in-house and can provide 24/7 monitoring and response. This service usually includes a service level agreement (SLA) ensuring confidentiality and response.
Learn more in our in-depth guide about incident response services.
Need an incident response provider?
Cynet is a trusted partner that analyses network and endpoint data, raises alerts, and protects against a wide range of known and zero-day threats. Cynet provides CyOps, an outsourced incident response team on call 24/7/365 to respond to critical incidents quickly and effectively. Cynet can deploy its powerful extended endpoint detection and response (XDR) system across thousands of endpoints in up to two hours to effectively mitigate threats across an enterprise.
Effective incident response is time-sensitive and relies on teams quickly identifying threats and initiating IRPs. Unfortunately, most teams are not capable of investing all alerts in real-time to determine if something is an incident. This can lead to incidents being missed entirely or only being caught after significant damage has occurred.
Automating parts of your incident response can help avoid this oversight or delay. It can be used to:
When automating IR, a common method you can use is to create playbooks. Playbooks are essentially scripts that team members or security solutions can follow or initiate. These scripts define response steps to be taken and instruct responders, systems, or solutions to perform the defined actions.
Playbooks can be used for:
If you have manual playbooks, you can often easily transform the contained steps into automated processes. Depending on the programming knowledge of your responders, you can also use automated playbooks as backups to manual playbooks as needed.
Learn more in our in-depth guide about incident response playbooks.
In addition to playbooks, you can also employ IR platforms. These platforms are software that you can use to guide, assist, and automate your response efforts. Platforms are often comprehensive and can integrate with your existing systems.
Common features of IR platforms include:
Analyst support | Intelligence and analytics | Security automation |
|
|
|
Learn more in our in-depth guide about incident response platforms.
Generative AI can automate and accelerate incident response by generating contextual responses to incidents in real-time. Instead of relying on predefined rules or static playbooks, LLMs can interpret data in real time, understand the context of an alert or incident, and generate dynamic responses based on current conditions.
Generative AI can help analyze attacks, write incident reports, suggest remediation steps, summarize logs, and even automate communication with relevant stakeholders. This cuts down on manual analysis time and adds another insight layer, which both support security team decision-making. In high-pressure environments where minutes matter, this assistance can be extremely valuable.
Given the sensitive nature of security attacks, it’s recommended to treat generative AI as a co-pilot. This means keeping human security analysts in the loop to review GenAI recommendations, contributing their own insights and ultimately making the final call. This human-in-the-loop approach ensures that generative AI enhances response efforts without compromising oversight, accountability, or the nuance required in high-stakes situations.
In addition, generative AI can be used for practicing and playing out various incident response drills, to help prepare humans for real scenarios.
Cynet provides a holistic solution for cybersecurity, including the Cynet Response Orchestration which can automate your incident response policy. Users can define automated playbooks, with pre-set or custom remediation actions for multiple attack scenarios. Cynet automated playbooks also help detect threats to ensure that you only implement a manual response when it is necessary.
Cynet Response Orchestration can address any threat that involves infected endpoints, malicious processes or files, attacker-controlled network traffic, or compromised user accounts.
Together with our content partners, we have authored in-depth guides on several other topics that can also be useful as you explore the world of data security.
Authored by Cynet
Authored by Cynet
Authored by Cynet
An effective incident response process typically includes six core phases: preparation, identification, containment, eradication, recovery and lessons learned. Each phase plays a critical role in minimizing damage and ensuring a swift return to normal operations. A well-defined process also includes clear roles, communication protocols, and escalation paths to streamline decision-making under pressure.
Incident response teams rely on a mix of tools, including SIEM platforms, EDR, XDR, UEBA, SOAR, and more. These tools help analysts detect, analyze, and respond to threats more efficiently and with greater precision, while relieving the cognitive load and manual process burden and from security teams.
An incident response plan should be reviewed and updated at least annually. If there are significant changes in the organization’s infrastructure, threat landscape, or regulatory requirements, more frequent updating is recommended. Regular tabletop exercises and simulations can also uncover gaps that require updates. Keeping the plan current ensures that the team is prepared for evolving threats and organizational changes.
During an incident, teams often face security challenges like incomplete visibility, lack of technological tools to properly investigate the attack and inability to respond and contain the attack. At an organizational level, internal miscommunication and the need to coordinate with legal, PR, and executive leadership can further strain the process. And as with any stressful incident, time pressure, limited resources and fatigue can add to the strain.
Preparation starts with having a clear, tested incident response plan and a well-trained team that simulates attacks regularly. At the network level, maintain up-to-date asset inventories, visibility into the network and updated patching practices. Finally, establishing clear communication channels and engaging executive leadership will help ensure a swift, coordinated response when an incident occurs.
Incident response is a component of the broader security incident management framework, which includes detection, logging, compliance reporting and strategic risk management. It focuses on real-time handling of threats, while incident management includes longer-term analysis, metrics tracking and improving organizational resilience.
Looking for a powerful, cost effective XDR solution?
Search results for: